Placidus, Alcabitius, and Koch in a Nutshell

Placidus, Alcabitius, and Koch in a Nutshell
octubre 30, 2024
Autor: David Bustamante S.
Most confuse Placidus with either Alcabitius or Koch in their descriptions of the Placidus method. To say it briefly, because all three enforce the same principle differently. Learn more here.

● In a Placidean measurement, each sixth of the diurnal arc (i.e. each Placidean cuspal degree) represents the path travelled by a different zodiacal degree, which bears its own clock, speed, or time of ascension. Therefore, each length of time constitutes one, two, three, four, or five sixths of the time that would have elapsed since the sun’s rise if it had occupied that degree of the ecliptic (i.e. all five cuspal degrees constitute five different trisections). When we measure the houses of an astrograph, the sun does not occupy all the degrees simultaneously, but these bear with them the time established by the sun the first time it rose or dawned with them during the year. We thus measure the time of all simultaneously and uninterruptedly in order to determine the house cusps as accurately as possible. Such measurement, however, is not trigonometric, but physical. Because the intermediate cusps constitute times at which two different ecliptic degrees will become the eleventh and twelfth house cusps, two different, additional trisections need be made, for they represent two different ascensional times. For the purposes of revealing these two degrees, however, we need find two different times of two different earlier charts whose ascending degrees would have become the relevant cusps (twelfth and eleventh, respectively) at the time of birth. Or, simply, should you prove to be awesome at triangulation, triangulate bearing in mind the ascensional times of the signs or segments of the ecliptic above the horizon at the time of birth.

Alcabitius and Koch, for their part, are both methods of convenience only, that is, two different ways of abbreviating the Placidean exercise, so as not to bother with measuring the ascensional times of the intermediate cuspal degrees, which is why both methods assign to these a third of the amount of time of the only degree they measure: ASC, in the case of Alcabitius, and MC, in the case of Koch. In other words, under Alcabitius, the twelfth and eleventh house cusps are assigned a third (1/3) of the amount of time that the ascending degree (ASC) would have invested in travelling from the horizon to the midheaven (or one sixth 1/6 of the amount of time that said degree would have invested in travelling from the horizon to the opposite point), whereas, under Koch, the twelfth and eleventh house cusps are assigned a third (1/3) of the amount of time that the culminating degree (MC) would have invested in travelling from the horizon to the midheaven (or one sixth 1/6 of the amount of time that said degree would have invested in travelling from the horizon to the opposite point), which accounts for the displacement of the quadrant at the time of birth more conveniently than Alcabitius, for it is measuring how that quadrant or portion of the ecliptic got there at the time of birth in the first place (by placing the MC at the horizon in order to conduct the exercise, that is, in order to advance it two equal amounts of time whose thirds derive from the time of culmination of the midheaven degree only), not what the quadrant would look like after the time of birth (by placing the ASC at the midheaven in order to conduct the exercise, that is, in order to advance it two equal amounts of time whose thirds derive from the time of culmination of the ascending degree only).

● Therefore, while Koch- and Alcabitius-measured houses have the same time size, Placidus-measured houses do not (they are relative). Many confuse the proportional feature of seasonal hours (a consequence of Placidean measurement, as it is a natural, not a man-made, measurement) with the time size of a Placidean house, which is necessarily unequal.

Placidus, Alcabitius y Koch en la nuez

David Bustamante S.

La mayoría confunde a Placidus con Alcabitius o con Koch en sus descripciones del método Placidus, pues los tres aplican el mismo principio de tres maneras diferentes. Obtenga más información aquí.

Placidus, Alcabitius, and Koch in a Nutshell

David Bustamante S.

Most confuse Placidus with either Alcabitius or Koch in their descriptions of the Placidus method. To say it briefly, because all three enforce the same principle differently. Learn more here.

Have Holden, Rootjes, and Others Gotten it Right? Five Depictions

David Bustamante S.

The Placidean mechanism of action is the least understood of all the methods of house measurement, despite its simplicity and inherent naturalism. Learn what some of these errors are here.

El método Placidus masticado

David Bustamante S.

¿Está seguro de que comprende cómo funciona el método Placidus de división de casas? Ha habido muchos errores en su descripción. Haga click aquí para saber más.

The Placidus Method Chewed

David Bustamante S.

Are you sure you understand how the Placidus method of house division works? There have been many errors in its description. Click here to learn more.

Placidus y el método de división de casas semiarco, según Mike Wackford

Michael Wackford

Conozca el método de división de casas con base en una reflexión (comentada por nosotros) del astrólogo y músico Michael Wackford.

El mecanismo de acción placidiano (relatividad), espaciotiempo (Louis) y horas (Mike/Houlding)

David Bustamante S.

Conozca por qué la división Placidus de las casas se halla ineludiblemente relacionada con la relatividad y/o el espaciotiempo, y cómo Louis, Houlding y Wackford tratan el asunto.

Placidean Mechanism of Action (relativity), Spacetime (Louis), and Hours (Mike/Houlding)

David Bustamante S.

Learn why the Placidus division of the houses is inextricably linked to relativity and/or spacetime, and how Louis, Houlding, and Wackford address this.

¿Puede un sextil comportarse como una cuadratura?

Anthony Louis LaBruzza

Conozca la razón por la cual un sextil puede comportarse como una cuadratura, un efecto relativista primero advertido por Ptolomeo.

Ralph W. Holden’s Top 7 Takes on House Division and Astrology

David Bustamante S.

Learn what this bright astrologer and theorist had to say about house division and astrology as both an art and as a natural science.

¿La creencia en una (falsa) simetría compromete la objetividad de los astrólogos?

David Bustamante S.

La simetría constituye un criterio fundamental a los fines de juzgar la validez de una cosa, especialmente en física y en astrología. ¿Entendemos correctamente el concepto de simetría?

Is the belief in (a false) symmetry compromising astrologists’ objectivity?

David Bustamante S.

Symmetry has become a fundamental criteria for many when judging the validity of anything, especially in physics and astrology. Are we understanding symmetry correctly?